Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia is a common infection in patients with AIDS but an infrequent cause of pneumonia in cancer patients. Little is known about the impact of cancer type and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation on the presentation and outcome of P. jiroveci pneumonia in cancer patients. A retrospective cohort study of all patients with cancer and P. jiroveci pneumonia cared for at The M.D. Anderson Cancer Center during 1990-2003 was conducted. Eighty episodes of P. jiroveci pneumonia in 79 patients were identified. In most (67%) episodes, patients had a hematologic malignancy. In 23 (29%) episodes, patients had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Twenty-seven percent of patients with histopathologically confirmed P. jiroveci pneumonia had nodular infiltrates on the radiographic study. Pleural effusion and pneumothorax were more common in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation than in those with solid tumors. Clinical suspicion of P. jiroveci pneumonia was less common in patients with nodular infiltrates than in those without such a radiographic finding (7 vs. 39%; p=0.002). Twenty-six of 76 (34%) patients with data available died of P. jiroveci pneumonia. Predictors of death by univariate analysis included older age, tachypnea, high APACHE II score, use of mechanical ventilation or vasopressors, lower arterial pH level, absence of interstitial component, pneumothorax, and comorbid conditions (all p<0.05). Multivariate analysis identified the use of mechanical ventilation as an independent predictor of death. Death attributable to P. jiroveci pneumonia appeared to be higher in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The clinical presentation of P. jiroveci pneumonia in cancer patients may be affected by the category of cancer and the history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. P. jiroveci pneumonia remains a rare yet severe infection in cancer patients.

BACKGROUND:

The response to antifungal therapy alone often is suboptimal in patients with cancer who have therapy-refractory neutropenia, and even donor-derived granulocyte transfusions (GTX) are not always successful. The authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of immune enhancement using recombinant interferon gamma1b (rIFN-gamma1b) in patients with cancer who received GTX for refractory, systemic, opportunistic infections.

METHODS:

Twenty recipients of high-dose donor GTX ( approximately 5.5 x 10(10) neutrophils per transfusion) who had received concurrent rIFN-gamma1b between October 2001 and December 2004 were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS:

The median age (+/- standard deviation [SD]) was 45 +/- 17 years. Ten patients (50%) were men, 17 patients (85%) had leukemia, and 3 patients (15%) had myelodysplastic syndrome. The median +/- SD Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 15 +/- 4 (range, 7-22). Most patients (n = 18 patients; 90%) had recurrent or refractory cancer. In 6 patients (30%) who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, GTX plus rIFN-gamma1b was given a median +/- SD of 26 +/- 100 days (range, 12-372 days) after transplantation. Seventeen patients (85%) had neutropenia during GTX therapy. Five patients (25%) had possible invasive fungal infection, 3 patients (15%) had probable invasive fungal infection, and 11 patients (55%) had proven invasive fungal infection. One patient (5%) had refractory Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis. Eight patients (40%) received corticosteroids during GTX plus rIFN-gamma1b therapy. Patients received a median +/- SD of 8 +/- 7 GTX doses (range, 4-28 doses) and 9 +/- 7 rIFN-gamma1b doses (range, 1-28 doses), for a mean +/- SD cumulative dose (CD) of 400 +/- 2621 microg. Other concomitant cytokines were granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (12 +/- 3 doses; CD, 6720 +/- 4721 microg) in 15 patients (75%) and granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (12 +/- 9 doses; CD, 4750 +/- 4410 microg) in 14 patients (70%). Four patients (20%) developed fever, and 2 patients (10%) developed skin rashes. Reversible liver dysfunction (n = 3 patients; 15%) and tachycardia (n = 1 patients; 5%) were considered rIFN-gamma1b-associated adverse reactions; whereas, in 1 patient (5%), transient dyspnea was attributed to GTX. Four weeks after therapy started, 9 patients (45%) had complete or partial resolution of infection; and, in another 3 patients (15%), the invasive fungal infection had become stable.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current results indicated that no serious adverse events were associated with rIFN-gamma1b immune enhancement in patients with systemic opportunistic infections who received donor GTX therapy.

Endocarditis is uncommon in patients with cancer. The characteristics of culture-positive (CPE) and culture-negative endocarditis (CNE) in high-risk cancer patients are not known; therefore we sought to evaluate the disease characteristics in patients with endocarditis at a comprehensive cancer center. We retrospectively reviewed the transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal (TEE) echocardiograms obtained from 654 consecutive cancer patients in whom endocarditis was suspected between 1994 and 2004. Endocarditis was confirmed in 45 (7%) of 654 patients using modified Duke University criteria based on information obtained from hospital records and computerized data systems. In 21 (95%) of 22 cases, TEE examinations were diagnostic, and 16 (42%) of 38 patients with initially nondiagnostic TTE studies had the diagnosis confirmed by TEE study; this difference between diagnostic TEE and initial nondiagnostic TTE was significant (p < 0.0001). Among the 26 (58%) patients with CPE, Staphylococcus aureus (35%) was the most common organism isolated, followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species (23%). Eighteen (78%) of 23 patients with a central venous catheter had CPE, whereas only 8 (36%) of 22 patients without a central venous catheter had CPE (odds ratio [OR], 6.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69-23.53; p < 0.006). Vegetations were larger in patients with CPE than in patients with CNE (median +/- standard deviation, 10 +/- 8.8 vs. 8.7 +/- 3.9 mm). Fifteen patients (58%) with CPE and 10 (53%) with CNE had embolic complications. We note that cutaneous and septic pulmonary emboli were more common in patients with CPE than in patients with CNE (31% vs. 11% and 15% vs. 0%, respectively), whereas embolic cerebrovascular and fatal embolic coronary events were more common in patients with CNE than in those with CPE (37% vs. 12% and 21% vs. 0%, respectively; p = 0.026). The 4-week endocarditis-attributable death rate did not differ significantly between the groups (CPE, 15% vs. CNE, 32%; p = 0.28). On stepwise multivariate regression analysis, patients with neutropenia (OR, 22.52; 95% CI, 2.25-225.48; p < 0.008) and those with embolic cerebrovascular events (OR, 17.07; 95% CI, 1.63-178.45; p < 0.01) had an increased probability of death due to endocarditis. The clinical spectrums of CPE and CNE differed in these patients with cancer. In patients with CNE, embolic cerebrovascular and fatal myocardial infarction were relatively common.

BACKGROUND:

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia is frequently found in cancer patients. This study attempted to determine how often the catheters were the source of this infection and the risk factors associated with catheter-related bacteremias.

METHODS:

The microbiology records were retrospectively reviewed of all cancer patients having S. maltophilia bacteremia and indwelling central venous catheters seen between January 1998 and January 2004. In a multivariate analysis the patients’ clinical characteristics, antimicrobial therapy, outcome, and source of bacteremia that were significantly associated with definite catheter-related S. maltophilia bacteremia as opposed to secondary bacteremia were identified.

RESULTS:

A total of 217 bacteremias were identified in 207 patients: 159 (73%) were primary catheter-related (53 definite, 89 probable, and 17 possible), 11 (5%) were primary noncatheter-related, and 47 (22%) were secondary. Multivariate analysis showed the following factors to be independently associated with definite catheter-related bacteremias: 1) polymicrobial bacteremia (odds ratio [OR], 7.6; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.3-45.5); 2) no prior intensive care unit admission (OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.005-0.578); and 3) nonneutropenic status at onset (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.013-0.419). The response rate to appropriate antibiotics and catheter removal was 95% in the patients with definite catheter-related bloodstream infections, compared with only 56% in the patients with secondary bacteremias (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The majority of the S. maltophilia bacteremias occurring in cancer patients with indwelling central venous catheters appear to be catheter-related and are often polymicrobial. Catheter-related S. maltophilia bacteremias occurred more frequently in noncritically ill, nonneutropenic patients, and prompt removal of the catheter was found to be associated with a better prognosis.